Multifamily Trends - January/February 2006 - Point of View
Building the First 21st-Century Cities
by John McIlwain
Multifamily housing is the key to creating lively, walkable,
sustainable mixed-income neighborhoods.
Evan Rose, a young architect from San Francisco, put out a
challenge at ULI’s 2005 Fall Meeting in Los Angeles, declaring that “New
Orleans can become the first 21st-century city—a city built in tune with
nature.” His challenge immediately stoked the imagination of all in the
room. They had gathered to consider how best to rebuild the destroyed
city, and saw this as the possible silver lining in the clouds of
Hurricane Katrina. But what would such a vision entail? Could it
encompass all the towns along the Gulf Coast destroyed by Katrina? And
what role does multifamily housing have to play in such a vision?
Causing from $70 billion to $130 billion of damage, Hurricane
Katrina was the most expensive natural disaster in U.S. history. It
created a humanitarian crisis on a scale unseen in the United States
since the Great Depression, displacing more than a million people and
leaving 80 percent of New Orleans flooded. It is regarded as the largest
urban disaster in U.S. history—worse than the San Francisco earthquake
of 1906, the Chicago fire of 1871, and the terrorist attacts of 9/11.
Yet, new visions and possible new ways of developing are emerging from
this devastation that respond to the natural environment instead of
defying it.
It is still too early for rebuilding plans to be fully developed,
and for all the many issues to be resolved. Nevertheless, interesting
ideas are emerging to which the multifamily industry in particular
should pay close attention. Disasters accelerate the spread of trends as
obstacles to change are removed, forcing people to rethink how they want
to live and build their communities. The level of destruction in New
Orleans and other cities along the coast is such that residents have a
virtually free hand in creating new communities, drawing on the very
best urban and ecological thinking of the day. National trends such as
the move back into urban areas and increased sensitivity to surrounding
ecologies can have powerful, positive impacts on these plans for
redevelopment. And while it may be uncomfortable, even the long-term
trend to ever-higher energy prices can serve as a stimulus for better
patterns of redevelopment. Interestingly, an important component of each
of these trends is multifamily housing.
The first visions for rebuilding were created by the Mississippi
Governor’s Commission on Recovery, Rebuilding, and Renewal, which
sponsored a weeklong architectural charrette in mid-October, the results
of which can be seen at www.
mississippirenewal.com/info/plansPresentations. html. Eleven Mississippi
towns destroyed by Katrina were studied and visions of how they might be
rebuilt were put forth. What emerged is based on the principles of new
urbanism, including street grids, mixing uses, and housing types and
town centers that draw on local vernacular architectural styles. At the
heart of these proposed designs is multifamily housing. All the
streetscapes of the towns show multifamily housing, from low rise to mid
rise, depending on the context. At this time, the solutions are only
visions, not yet vetted by local citizens. They demonstrate, however,
the thinking of a large group of architects working in close
collaboration with local officials.
The same trend is emerging in early discussions about the
rebuilding of New Orleans. There is wide agreement among residents of
New Orleans that the city needs to be rebuilt better than it was, but
what does this mean in physical terms? Community leaders from many parts
of the city and a variety of economic backgrounds talk about mixed-use
neighborhoods with housing affordable to people with a wide range of
incomes—walkable neighborhoods with structures that reflect the best
vernacular building styles of New Orleans. These include the famous
shotguns, camelbacks, and Creole cottages, but they also include the
multifamily styles of the French Quarter.
These views are reflected in the many conferences that have been
held recently on the reconstruction of the city, including a ULI
advisory services panel that presented its report on November 18 and
made the most specific recommendations to date for rebuilding New
Orleans. The ULI panel’s recommendations can be found at
www.uli.org/katrina and in the January 2006 issue of Urban Land
magazine. Given the extent of the city’s destruction, the panel
recommended that redevelopment be focused first on the higher, safer
parts of the city while the lower, more heavily flooded regions be
studied. These higher grounds, however, already contain housing, retail,
and commercial development, and include most of the city’s older
historic neighborhoods. How, then, is it possible to provide the
opportunity for everyone to return, another of the recommendations of
the ULI panel? The only way to do this is to build more densely than in
the past. This does not mean more density than New Orleans has seen
before, for the city has always had neighborhoods with density that,
were it copied along the high ground, would allow for sufficient housing
for all who wished to return to do so. There is also the central
business district that could accommodate multifamily high rises to match
its tall office towers (some of which may well be ripe for conversion to
residential use). All this means a renewed city built with neighborhoods
that mix uses and incomes, neighborhoods of low- and mid-rise
residential buildings, with stores and restaurants along the street,
designed much in the spirit of the French Quarter.
These early visions emerging from Mississippi and New Orleans
reflect both the practicalities of local circumstances and the growing
desire for better-built urban neighborhoods. This trend is evident in
the housing booms witnessed in so many central cities and in satellite
urban centers in most of the nation’s metropolitan regions. Central to
their success is multifamily housing, both rental and for sale.
Higher densities also allow for a more sustainable, green building
pattern. Less land is used to house more people, permitting the
residential areas most susceptible to flooding to be returned to
wetlands to provide protection from future floods. The cost of denser
development on higher ground is less than the cost of the massive levees
needed to protect lowlands from the Category 5 hurricanes being
predicted for coming hurricane seasons as a result of rising water
temperatures in the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico, which is in
turn a result of global warming. These savings then can be used to
provide sufficient housing subsidies to allow families of all income
levels to return to better housing and stronger neighborhoods.
Finally, and of significance, multifamily housing is far more
energy efficient than single-family housing of equal quality. The
long-term global supply-and-demand trends for oil and gas are
problematic. India and China have rapidly growing populations and
economies, and their consumption of fossil fuels is rising dramatically,
putting intense pressure on the already delicate balance of supply and
demand around the globe. Absent a major and sustained economic
depression, demand will soon outstrip production of both oil and gas,
driving U.S. prices up well beyond today’s price ranges as we compete
with the rest of the world for limited resources. Low-density building
patterns make sense only when energy is cheap. With the coming end of
cheap energy, rebuilding on the scale required by Katrina in the
low-density suburban patterns of the past would be absurd and
unsustainable.
In short, the 21st-century city—as well as 21st-century towns and
coastal areas—will be built to higher densities, with lively, walkable,
sustainable mixed-income neighborhoods. Multifamily housing will be the
predominant housing stock. That is Evan Rose’s vision of how New Orleans
and the towns along the Gulf Coast can be rebuilt. It will take great
leadership from the governmental, industrial, and grass-roots sectors to
bring these visions into reality, but the opportunity is one that, it is
hoped, will not come along again for a long time, if ever.
John McIlwain is a ULI Senior Resident Fellow and
ULI/J. Ronald Terwilliger Chair for Housing.
Multifamily Trends: January/February
2006
© 2006 ULIthe Urban Land Institute, all rights reserved.